🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always felt the burden of her father’s heritage. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the most famous UK composers of the early 20th century, Avril’s name was shrouded in the deep shadows of bygone eras.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I reflected on these legacies as I prepared to make the world premiere recording of Avril’s 1936 piano concerto. With its emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and confident beats, Avril’s work will provide music lovers valuable perspective into how the composer – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – envisioned her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about shadows. It can take a while to adjust, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to tell reality from misrepresentation, and I was reluctant to face her history for some time.

I earnestly desired her to be a reflection of her father. Partially, this was true. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be observed in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the headings of her father’s compositions to see how he viewed himself as not just a champion of English Romanticism but a advocate of the African diaspora.

It was here that father and daughter began to differ.

American society evaluated Samuel by the excellence of his compositions rather than the his racial background.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the Royal College of Music, her father – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – started to lean into his heritage. Once the Black American writer Paul Laurence Dunbar came to London in that era, the aspiring artist was keen to meet him. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral composition that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an international hit, especially with African Americans who felt shared pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the excellence of his music as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Principles and Actions

Recognition failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. During that period, he was present at the pioneering African conference in London where he met the Black American thinker the renowned Du Bois and witnessed a range of talks, such as the subjugation of the Black community there. He was a campaigner until the end. He maintained ties with early civil rights leaders such as this intellectual and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on racial equality, and even engaged in dialogue on racial problems with the American leader on a trip to the presidential residence in the early 1900s. In terms of his art, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so prominently as a musician that it will endure.” He succumbed in the early 20th century, aged 37. Yet how might Samuel have reacted to his child’s choice to travel to the African nation in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the African American magazine Jet magazine. This policy “seems to me the correct approach”, Avril told Jet. Upon further questioning, she backtracked: she was not in favor with this policy “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to run its course, directed by good-intentioned people of all races”. Had Avril been more attuned to her family’s principles, or from Jim Crow America, she may have reconsidered about this system. However, existence had protected her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I hold a English document,” she stated, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my background.” So, with her “porcelain-white” complexion (according to the magazine), she moved within European circles, lifted by their praise for her renowned family member. She delivered a lecture about her parent’s compositions at the Cape Town university and directed the national orchestra in Johannesburg, including the bold final section of her concerto, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” While a confident pianist personally, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her work. Instead, she always led as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, in her own words, she “might bring a transformation”. However, by that year, things fell apart. After authorities learned of her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the UK representative urged her to go or be jailed. She came home, feeling great shame as the magnitude of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a difficult one,” she lamented. Compounding her humiliation was the 1955 publication of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Familiar Story

While I reflected with these shadows, I felt a familiar story. The account of identifying as British until you’re not – that brings to mind African-descended soldiers who fought on behalf of the British in the second world war and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,